Fashion-and-life.co.uk
Fashion-and-life is ranked 1,032,014 in the United Kingdom. 'Fashion and life.'
1,032,014Rank in United Kingdom
8,441,390Worldwide Rank
Monthly pages viewed | 2,064 | |
Monthly visits | 1,474 | |
Value per visitor | -- | |
Estimated worth | £768.09 | |
External links | 13 | |
Number of pages | 225 |
Last Updated: 05/04/2018 . Estimated data, read disclaimer.
Visitors
Traffic History 90 Day Average | ||
Worldwide Rank | 7,093,605 | 3,442,464 |
---|---|---|
Daily Visitors | 28 | -58.33% |
Daily Visitors Rank | 6,575,652 | 3,076,413 |
Daily Pageviews | 0 | -67.57% |
Daily Pageviews Rank | 8,561,099 | 4,100,426 |
Pageviews Per User | 1.40 | -22.60% |
Content
www.Fashion-and-life.co.uk
- Popular pages
- fashion-and-life.co.uk Fashion mistakes #2 – The Comb-over | Fashion and life
- fashion-and-life.co.uk Alexa Chung fashion | Fashion and life
- fashion-and-life.co.uk Should we have UK Hipster Traps? | Fashion and life
- fashion-and-life.co.uk The sexy, ever changing Rihanna style | Fashion and life
The estimated 30 daily visitors, each view 1.40 pages on average.
Links- Links out
- youtube.com The T-Mobile Royal Wedding - YouTube
- thelooksforless.com The Looks For Less
- styleite.com Katy Perry Nails - Russell Brand - PHOTOS | Styleite
Server Location | |
1 1 Internet Ag Baden-wurttemberg Germany 51.206883, 9.887695 |
Its web server is located at 1 1 Internet Ag Baden-wurttemberg. Its local IP address is 82.165.116.82. It has 2 DNS records, ns68.1and1.co.uk, and ns67.1and1.co.uk.
IP: 82.165.116.82
PING www. (82.165.116.82) 56(84) bytes of data. | |
64 bytes from kundenserver.de (82.165.116.82): icmp_req=1 ttl=54 | 130 ms |
64 bytes from kundenserver.de (82.165.116.82): icmp_req=2 ttl=54 | 130 ms |
64 bytes from kundenserver.de (82.165.116.82): icmp_req=3 ttl=54 | 130 ms |
--- www. ping statistics --- | |
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2000ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 130.144/130.257/130.389/0.311 ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 130.144/130.257/130.389/0.311 ms |
Pinging the server, resulted in a 130 ms response.